what the bleep do we know debunked

Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? It was clearly time to check the facts for myself. It's there. But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. "The protagonist, Amanda, played by Academy Award-Winning actress Marlee Matlin, finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind what we consider to be our normal, waking reality. In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. Scientists in the physical realm also hypothesize that matter is solid (Wilson 5). Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. But when you get hit with so much information that's been edited to within a frame of its life, things get a bit confusing. During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. To date, there has been no response as to where the information which lead to the story about the indians not being able to see the ships of Columbus originated from. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. The main thing to know is that "observation" is a bad word for the process which goes on which we have inherited from the days when quantum mechanics was first discovered, and is unfortunately a bit easier to teach in introductory courses than decoherence. But the movie gradually moves to quantum 'insights' that lead a woman to toss away her antidepressant medication, to the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior, and on to even greater nonsense." His 73 papers are mostly about supersymmetric GUTs and considered quite respectable, with a total of over 5000 citations, including 641 citations for one of them alone. The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" [7], According to Publishers Weekly, the film was one of the sleeper hits of 2004, as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year." Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. We hear more and more from JZ Knight, a woman channeling the ancient warrior Ramtha, a chap who (through Knight) incidentally leads the Ramtha School of Enlightenment. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. It was really hard to sit through. "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. The director, William Arntz, has described What the Bleep as a film for the "metaphysical left". Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". But when you hear about quantum mechanics and consciousness, you should assume the author is a crackpot unless proven otherwise. Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. " " " !". It presents itself as the thinking rebel's alternative to Hollywood pabulum: a heady stew of drama and documentary, starring Oscar-winning actress Marlee Matlin as a Xanax-addled photographer who. Joe Dispenza Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful. He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. Do we know" . [12], Richard Dawkins stated that "the authors seem undecided whether their theme is quantum theory or consciousness. She works as a free-lancer for an agency, where her boss is played by Barry Newman. As the discussion moves from science to pop psychology, the film s endorsement of Ramtha s School Of Enlightenment and its simplistic self-improvement mantra becomes clear. It's certainly not. Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. That would be, very hard to quantify:). Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. It was the biggest bunch of garbage that I had ever seen. About. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. Nasa found something. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. In 1958 nasa started mapping the ocean and exploring it. If quantum physics baffled the late Dr. Feynman, one of its most brilliant explorers, then no one should feel embarrassed for failing to understand the subject. Moreover, assume that they want your money. up and at each step we're eliminating information and finally what is bubbling up to consciousness is the one that is most self-serving. The observer can't be ignored." Even skeptics concede that we humans can fall into destructive thought patterns and need to cleanse our vision of what's real. was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. The narrative follows a fictional photographer, Amanda, through her emotional and existential journey of life. But how are ordinary mortals to judge its assertions about the nature of matter, mind, and the universe? Is this a hoax to promote positivity? The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. 1. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." I am glad that someone else thought that that movie was a bunch of garbage. The Christian Science Monitor has expired. Many people are dubious that Penrose's suggestions are reasonable, because the brain is not an isolated quantum-mechanical system. The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. ", "What the Bleep Do We Know!? They don't go anywhere, Fred. It is just a movie. (It's all to do with photons of light from your measuring instrument hitting the poor electron and knocking it for six). "[5] The same article quotes Bill Pfau, Advertising Manager of Inner Traditions, as saying "More and more ideas from the New Age community have become accepted into the mainstream. 8. Your subscription to We use it to assign probabilities to possible measurement outcomes on the basis of actual measurement outcomes. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. William Arntz has referred to the film as "WTFDWK" in a message to the film's street team. (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. Where were we now? Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. Yet, the battle still ranges, and we now know where we can class the distinctions of LQG and String theorists? There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. The flip side of that is that you can use quantum mechanics, again in specially prepared systems, to communicate in a way that will allow us to know when someone is eavesdropping. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. 3. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too. Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. Thus, if a scientist repeats an experiment with subatomic particles often enough, the results will closely match the probabilities quantum theory predicts. The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. Gifted and talented kids: how do you nurture a curious mind. subscription. 3. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". I was expecting something pretty dumb, but am always interested to see what people think about quantum mechanics. John Haglin You are free to comment as you wish. This website uses cookies to People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. It was amusing when John Hagelin tried to run for US president representing the Natural Law party during the 1990s. : Down the Rabbit Hole: Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." We are connected to the world by many things: by light and sound and heat. Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? So thanks to Associate Professor Zdenka Kuncik, Professor Peter Schofield and Professor Max Coltheart for shedding some light on the Bleeping thing. And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. [17] Eric Scerri in a review for Committee for Skeptical Inquiry dismisses it as "a hodgepodge of all kinds of crackpot nonsense," where "science [is] distorted and sensationalized". How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. Never mind that the movie didnt even have a plot. That's not the case. Featuring two (!) 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. Daniel Monti, physician and director of the Mind-Body Medicine Program at. And we are certainly not isolated from the rest of the world. Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. It is true that quantum mechanics is extremely strange, and on extremely small scales for short times, all sorts of weird things happen. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . We all know most parts of the ocean are still undiscovered but there's plenty of theories. Columbus certainly didn't speak the language, and the locals didn't keep written records. Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. And a lot of people talk about quantum consciousness that even if the everyday world we see is not a system that can be changed, our consciousness about the world can be changed. Quotes From the Movies Science Of The Mind Fifth Dimension Joe Dispenza Get What You Want Neurons Brain Spirituality The infinite info that the brain is processing every single second tells us there is more to the world then we're perceiving it. When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. In the 1970s that abruptly stopped and moved to getting us off this planet. Featured individuals [ edit] The film features interview segments of: It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. 3. Initially, the film was released in only two theaters: one in Yelm, Washington (the home of the producers, which is also the home of Ramtha), and the other the Bagdad Theater in Portland, Oregon, where it was filmed.

Is Straight Pipe Exhaust Illegal In Australia, Articles W